24th May 2010, 08:56 AM
I too was clear that the website I was about to view would contain extreme pro BNP views.. (but I have added a warning as well just to make it clear)
It is clear that the arguments are flawed in the extreme.. much like the druid argument concerning reburial as well.
To take a single part of the premise..
Discuss.. and see if you can see the flaws... (no prizes... but an example of the warped logic in action)
Here we see a classic example of talking about 'experts' (unnamed) producing data ... which then becomes a supporting 'fact' for the next statement, which of course the reasonable sounding "Even at" and 'apparently' to give the impression of understanding the principal that all scientific archaeological debate needs a degree of doubt... but then creates a sweeping (again unsupproted) statement that we already know things (a fab vague word) have not changed much. what things? the price of tetley tea? And then the baffling and again unsupported 6ft large brained skeletons which goes on to prove the next paragraph... etc... ad infinitum. You could go through each sentance and dicredit it, however the shout would come back saying, ah... you are part of the liberal namby pamby conspiracy to deny our caucasian past..etc... blah blah... and on it would go.
We could however just agree collectively that the BNP indigenous briton campaign is so laughable and flawed... that it deserves no more that a simple reply...
Yer talking sh!te
It is clear that the arguments are flawed in the extreme.. much like the druid argument concerning reburial as well.
To take a single part of the premise..
Discuss.. and see if you can see the flaws... (no prizes... but an example of the warped logic in action)
Quote:We have already, with some experts help, found that 700,000 years ago, skeletal remains showed that early man, in Caucasoid (European) form, had communities that were stable and that prospered.
Even at the proposed 100,000 years ago, the amount of time that the fossil records apparently show regarding human beings from Africa emigrating, is far too late to have had a genetic impact on people already here. The gap is some 600,000 years.
We know that humans have not changed that much in that time period. Skeletons have been unearthed showing large frames (6 feet tall), large brains, and tools which enabled them to kill prey, and create suitable and permenant living conditions.
Here we see a classic example of talking about 'experts' (unnamed) producing data ... which then becomes a supporting 'fact' for the next statement, which of course the reasonable sounding "Even at" and 'apparently' to give the impression of understanding the principal that all scientific archaeological debate needs a degree of doubt... but then creates a sweeping (again unsupproted) statement that we already know things (a fab vague word) have not changed much. what things? the price of tetley tea? And then the baffling and again unsupported 6ft large brained skeletons which goes on to prove the next paragraph... etc... ad infinitum. You could go through each sentance and dicredit it, however the shout would come back saying, ah... you are part of the liberal namby pamby conspiracy to deny our caucasian past..etc... blah blah... and on it would go.
We could however just agree collectively that the BNP indigenous briton campaign is so laughable and flawed... that it deserves no more that a simple reply...
Yer talking sh!te