24th May 2010, 11:19 PM
Quote:[SIZE=3]Slagging off CA excellent
[/SIZE]
As I said I don’t know what a CA is or what CA does
The report, it appears set out to define it:
Quote:[SIZE=3]APPENDIX 1 COMMUNITY ARCHAEOLOGY SUPPORT OFFICER PROJECT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES,
1. To define ‘Community Archaeology’
a. To analyse, through the relevant literature, criteria for ‘community archaeology’
b. To establish, through the relevant literature, the theoretical framework within which ‘community archaeology’ sits
[/SIZE]
as far as I can see the document then forgets to answer …..
Quote:[SIZE=3]6. Conclusions
This report has indicated the scale of interest in archaeology within the UK and beyond, by demonstrating the high number of existing archaeological groups and related subject groups, as well as the diversity of activities and interests of those groups. The sheer amount of data collected, through qualitative and quantitative means, is too large to present in full in this report, but forms an important dataset for further analysis,
[/SIZE]
whack “community archaeology” in to google books and you find top of list
Y Marshall - World archaeology, 2002 - informaworld.com
Community archaeology, understood as a distinctive set of practices within the wider discipline, is a relatively new development. Its most important distinguishing characteristic is the relinquishing of at least partial control of a project to the local community. ...in my experience anything with marshall involves people of different….
Chuck word Marshall at CBA report bibliography nada.
Anyway whys every body so shy about picking a so called project, we havent got to HLF yet.