20th June 2008, 06:07 PM
As has already been posted the IFA is not the only producer of Archaeological standards and why would it be better for every archaeologist to have a vested interest in overlooking the shortfallings of a proffessional organisation?
I'm afraid those who have tried to change things internally have, i understand, repeatedly come up against the 'IFA way or the highway' view that seems fairly prevalent in supporters of the organisation. I still don't understand why those supporters are so fearful of the IFA itself having it's quality of service monitored externally?
I'm afraid those who have tried to change things internally have, i understand, repeatedly come up against the 'IFA way or the highway' view that seems fairly prevalent in supporters of the organisation. I still don't understand why those supporters are so fearful of the IFA itself having it's quality of service monitored externally?