not sure why Recording standards for watching briefs should be the same as for any other piece of archaeological work - even for negative watching briefs. my gripe with watching brief is that there should have been an evaluation first. Watching briefs without an evaluation are pure speculation by some relative of .....
Thread Rating:
First Watching Brief Nerves
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
First Watching Brief Nerves - by thundercat - 30th June 2010, 08:48 PM
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Watching the Curator | BAJR | 19 | 11,697 |
7th June 2012, 10:39 AM Last Post: serpentine |
|
A better brighter Britain but not for watching brief conditions | gwyl | 22 | 15,173 |
9th December 2010, 03:15 PM Last Post: the invisible man |
|
Longest Watching Brief | drpeterwardle | 29 | 16,067 |
1st July 2009, 12:18 PM Last Post: Unitof1 |
|
No Watching Brief on Pipelines!?! | AchingTrenchHeadAtADesk | 36 | 28,644 |
27th August 2008, 02:49 PM Last Post: Sparky |
|
The value of a watching brief | Post-Med Potterer | 52 | 44,472 |
21st February 2006, 02:38 PM Last Post: 1man1desk |
|
The chancellors watching brief! | 1man1desk | 2 | 2,784 |
5th December 2005, 11:06 PM Last Post: troll |
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)