6th July 2010, 01:52 PM
Presumably this is the alternative viewpoint.
I think if we start to explore why development archaeology is regulated by public curators, which I would suggest is linked to something called 'the planning system', which relates to the management of landuse for the betterment of the community and society, eg. 'the public interest', boring I know, then we will veer off topic.
Regardless of the reasoning of the person who started this thread, watching briefs, how different people conduct them, and how employers train and prepare staff to do them, is actually quite a useful discussion to have on BAJR
Quote:[SIZE=4]I expect to make a lot more if they get rid of the curators and make the planning applicants self curate but not holding my breath just yet.[/SIZE]Hmm...:face-thinks:
I think if we start to explore why development archaeology is regulated by public curators, which I would suggest is linked to something called 'the planning system', which relates to the management of landuse for the betterment of the community and society, eg. 'the public interest', boring I know, then we will veer off topic.
Regardless of the reasoning of the person who started this thread, watching briefs, how different people conduct them, and how employers train and prepare staff to do them, is actually quite a useful discussion to have on BAJR