6th July 2010, 02:21 PM
Sticks in my throat, but (it had to happen one day)......Unit of One is right!! ...There is nothing to say that archaeology must be regulated by public curators...
I know of at least one county which has outsourced its archaeological functions (including it's curatorial role) to a private company. There is also the example of the majority of London boroughs who collectively defer their archaeological functions to an external body, which happens at present to be English Heritage, but one guesses could be any other other body (private or public) able to undertake the curatorial function.
I know of at least one county which has outsourced its archaeological functions (including it's curatorial role) to a private company. There is also the example of the majority of London boroughs who collectively defer their archaeological functions to an external body, which happens at present to be English Heritage, but one guesses could be any other other body (private or public) able to undertake the curatorial function.
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...