19th July 2010, 11:20 AM
Or do they machine all the way to the bottom and draw the section. I think that your best way of looking at evaluations is that no two are the same and that’s the problem with standards/map2/ Evaluation I think is mentioned once in pps5/6 and merely described as an “inexpensive method” in ppg16.
Maybe all so called methods are going on at the same time. Another issue is whether the evaluation should be a lost leader.
What you should be getting at is pricing and profit. What do you mean by how often do evaluations produce misleading results. Do you mean the evaluation made a loss or do you mean that someone else undertook a subsequent excavation which as a result of the evaluation made a loss. I don’t really see how that could happen. Has anybody heard of an evaluation which lead to court action for producing misleading results?
Maybe all so called methods are going on at the same time. Another issue is whether the evaluation should be a lost leader.
What you should be getting at is pricing and profit. What do you mean by how often do evaluations produce misleading results. Do you mean the evaluation made a loss or do you mean that someone else undertook a subsequent excavation which as a result of the evaluation made a loss. I don’t really see how that could happen. Has anybody heard of an evaluation which lead to court action for producing misleading results?