20th July 2010, 04:53 PM
mpoole Wrote:It was not 'censored', I removed the image provided as a stop-gap measure to ensure that nothing else inflammatory was posted in a public forum rather than allowing the discussion to go forward in private. If you feel you were censored, perhaps you could have addressed that issue with me in a private communication
Why should he have addressed it to you in a private communication? You removed something that was the crux of his argument, rightly or wrongly, however you want to dress it up, that is censorship. I think the guy has been a bit naive over this job, as already pointed out, but he has to have read it somewhere and it was on the BAJR database. Would you suggest he has hacked the BAJR database to apply for a rejected job advert. This issue should be discussed in the open, why shouldn't it?
In my experience on other forums, constant calls for private discussions are usually at the hands of inappropriate moderators who like to stifle debate; I don't think forums are for these types of individuals.
What the big secret? In my experience of the BAJR job site, the jobs have been genuine, and far more than Jobcentre Plus, lots of scams getting through on there, but this talk of inflammatory postings and private messages is off putting, it all sounds a little paranoid.
Has this advert appeared on BAJR website, even if just for a few hours?