24th July 2010, 01:02 AM
There is an interesting twist however in the potential vote on such developments. My understanding is that such plans could go ahead provided that not more than 10% vote against such development...... rather than a straight majority in favour. If only such logic were applied to the General Election - sorry Messrs Cameron and Clegg you are unfit for office because more than 10% of folk voted against you....
As Vulpes suggests there is nothing in this proposal that goes against current planning rules.... other than the presumption that such development would be deemed acceptable if all other conditions are met. I wish sometimes people would read the fine detail rather than just comment on the headline....a discussion on Britarch on the same subject has got all kinds of folk flustered, none of whom seem to know what they are actually discussing!!
As Vulpes suggests there is nothing in this proposal that goes against current planning rules.... other than the presumption that such development would be deemed acceptable if all other conditions are met. I wish sometimes people would read the fine detail rather than just comment on the headline....a discussion on Britarch on the same subject has got all kinds of folk flustered, none of whom seem to know what they are actually discussing!!
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...