3rd July 2008, 10:51 AM
I cant say that I see any wonderful advantage so far and the landowner thing seems to be drifting over the horizon.
You mean there is somebody called the archaeologist, maybe not, just contractor even. M1 had me thinking that they were an archaeological contractor. Probably trying to steal some magic archaeology dust to sprinkle over the word named consultant, which would appear to be a very intriguing named position presumably with its own named insurance liabilities although named for what I ponder. I rather have a named archaeologist, now that would unbelievable. Imagine, the person might run off with the record.
Still seems that the engineer creole is superfluous or their format or definition of terms. As far as I understand contracts its lawyer terms and format and for developer I would speack in bankesse.
Archaeologist: We?ve done the watching brief and found Stonehenge II. You?ll have to hold off building your road for a year. Oh, and I?ll need ?1,000,000 to dig it up.
Developer: Are you telling me that you need to vary the contract under clause 3.7 to cover a contingency for significant remains?
Consultant: Yes, that?s about the size of it.
Developer: Flip me! A year? Can you make it nine months and what can you do for cash?
Consultant: I can make it in 2 weeks for half the cash but I will need it up front. Hows that other job coming along, the stone circle thingy thing, have you considered a flyover? You?ll need a desk top study. There not cheep you know You have to go to HERs.
Archaeologist: I am not really an archaeologist but you hired me so I must be I have 25 days work experience and that was in Uganda but if you say that I can do it in a week and for a fiver you must know what your talking about.
Still holding on to my cooing noise
You mean there is somebody called the archaeologist, maybe not, just contractor even. M1 had me thinking that they were an archaeological contractor. Probably trying to steal some magic archaeology dust to sprinkle over the word named consultant, which would appear to be a very intriguing named position presumably with its own named insurance liabilities although named for what I ponder. I rather have a named archaeologist, now that would unbelievable. Imagine, the person might run off with the record.
Still seems that the engineer creole is superfluous or their format or definition of terms. As far as I understand contracts its lawyer terms and format and for developer I would speack in bankesse.
Quote:quote:in words that engineers understand (for this read also ?developers?, ?builders?, ?corporate land wreckers
Archaeologist: We?ve done the watching brief and found Stonehenge II. You?ll have to hold off building your road for a year. Oh, and I?ll need ?1,000,000 to dig it up.
Developer: Are you telling me that you need to vary the contract under clause 3.7 to cover a contingency for significant remains?
Consultant: Yes, that?s about the size of it.
Developer: Flip me! A year? Can you make it nine months and what can you do for cash?
Consultant: I can make it in 2 weeks for half the cash but I will need it up front. Hows that other job coming along, the stone circle thingy thing, have you considered a flyover? You?ll need a desk top study. There not cheep you know You have to go to HERs.
Archaeologist: I am not really an archaeologist but you hired me so I must be I have 25 days work experience and that was in Uganda but if you say that I can do it in a week and for a fiver you must know what your talking about.
Still holding on to my cooing noise