14th August 2010, 10:07 PM
Well, at least the IFA are thinking about moving forwards. Strikes me that Chartered status as a profession could have some fairly hefty advantages. It could also be a potentially painful transition for some. I think this thread could be just the place for some reasoned dialogue on this....
Just what does holding Chartered status do for the profession on the whole and for the workforce as individuals? How does a modern 21st century Chartered profession operate and what legal standing do they have? What would Chartered status mean for those of us who are not members of the IFA? Far too many questions to ask tonight so more later....
Just really responded to this quickly before heading back to the X-Box so a bit short but just to emphasise that this really is a discussion we need to have and arguably-this is the best place to have it on the basis that there are plenty of pro and not-so-pro IFA subscribers here so a balanced "chat" should break out!
Just what does holding Chartered status do for the profession on the whole and for the workforce as individuals? How does a modern 21st century Chartered profession operate and what legal standing do they have? What would Chartered status mean for those of us who are not members of the IFA? Far too many questions to ask tonight so more later....
Just really responded to this quickly before heading back to the X-Box so a bit short but just to emphasise that this really is a discussion we need to have and arguably-this is the best place to have it on the basis that there are plenty of pro and not-so-pro IFA subscribers here so a balanced "chat" should break out!