16th August 2010, 10:04 AM
Apparently the old ifa was turned down for chartered status
http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/showthread.php?2280-chartered-status&p=43846&viewfull=1
A few years ago, 2008, the institute changed its name in order to attract professionals from the wider historic environment sector, attempting to go chartered it would appear that it would like to define a distinct profession, presumably its got a definition for heritage professional.
Then there is the criteria
http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page45.asp
but lets pretend that chartered status was granted and then it was granted the right to register archaeologists and that anybody who was not chartered was not allowed to call themselves an archaeologists only then would we get to whats most important and that is that the ifa would have to decide on the uniform
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&PageNumber=0&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=1082871&ActiveTextDocId=1082871&filesize=17612
Only a mankini will do, thing is what colour and material will be acceptable across the sexes, sises, ages and dont forget the comuimudity and vollunueenier archaeologists.
What we need hosty is a poll
http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/showthread.php?2280-chartered-status&p=43846&viewfull=1
A few years ago, 2008, the institute changed its name in order to attract professionals from the wider historic environment sector, attempting to go chartered it would appear that it would like to define a distinct profession, presumably its got a definition for heritage professional.
Then there is the criteria
http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page45.asp
Quote:[SIZE=3]Each application is dealt with on its merits, but in the case of professional institutions the main criteria are:
(a) the institution concerned should comprise members of a unique profession, and should have as members most of the eligible field for membership, without significant overlap with other bodies.
(b) corporate members of the institution should be qualified to at least first degree level in a relevant discipline;
© the institution should be financially sound and able to demonstrate a track record of achievement over a number of years;
(d) incorporation by Charter is a form of Government regulation as future amendments to the Charter and by-laws of the body require Privy Council (ie Government) approval. There therefore needs to be a convincing case that it would be in the public interest to regulate the body in this way;
(e) the institution is normally expected to be of substantial size (5,000 members or more).
It should be stressed that appearing to meet these criteria does not mean that a body will automatically be granted a Charter.
[/SIZE]
but lets pretend that chartered status was granted and then it was granted the right to register archaeologists and that anybody who was not chartered was not allowed to call themselves an archaeologists only then would we get to whats most important and that is that the ifa would have to decide on the uniform
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&PageNumber=0&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=1082871&ActiveTextDocId=1082871&filesize=17612
Only a mankini will do, thing is what colour and material will be acceptable across the sexes, sises, ages and dont forget the comuimudity and vollunueenier archaeologists.
What we need hosty is a poll