9th July 2008, 12:00 AM
Dear god, make it go away. It made 10,000BC look positively well researched. Who was the archaeological advisor on this programme? Will anyone admit to it? Who calls it a "dig site" anyway? And where was the county mountie? It was a development so surely there was a county mountie involved. Why were they not leading the charge? Oh, and were all those figgers students? They must have been because there seemed to be one per sqm of the trench. Someone had better tell the IFA. I'm sure that it's against the rules somewhere.
It was like a car crash. I could not tear my eyes away even as I wished to tear them out. Why else did I watch it to the end? Having seen the comments on the "fan" site, I don't think it was that well received.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antique
"A great victory for rangers and hamsters everywhere. Right, Boo?" - Minsc
It was like a car crash. I could not tear my eyes away even as I wished to tear them out. Why else did I watch it to the end? Having seen the comments on the "fan" site, I don't think it was that well received.
Cheers,
Eggbasket
Gentleman Adventurer and Antique
"A great victory for rangers and hamsters everywhere. Right, Boo?" - Minsc