15th November 2010, 01:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 15th November 2010, 03:51 PM by overseas.)
kevin wooldridge Wrote:I think I see where you are going David but the 'poll question' is not worded very well.
!
To be honest it makes perfect sense to me, and the incomprehension it seems to have provoked, to be the most disturbing thing. Of course, site reports should be based on post-ex analysis and be syntheses of the site that was discovered. If they're not, then please tell me what is actually happening?
However, having just re-read the question - perhaps I agree: recording should simply be a given, it should not be a choice between the one and the other. Equally, recording without time for the production of proper, analytical/synthetical post ex reports, is unacceptable. Perhaps someone could fill me in, or direct me to the main points of the new planning guidance to see what the problem is?