19th November 2010, 06:03 PM
It gets worse -
and who is coming up with this?
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Lets look at one of these precision engineered balls... of which 425 are known.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]780[/ATTACH] OR [ATTACH=CONFIG]781[/ATTACH]
etc... see more here: http://www.ashmolean.org/ash/britarch/hi...balls.html
Not exactly spheres are they? They are amazing, but hardly ball bearings! :0
Quote: Experts hit on the new idea after examining mysterious stone balls found near Stonehenge-like monuments in Aberdeenshire, Scotland.
About the size of a cricket ball, they are precisely fashioned to be within a millimetre of the same size.
This suggests they were meant to be used together in some way rather than individually.
The Scottish stone circles are similar in form to Stonehenge, but contain some much larger stones.
and who is coming up with this?
Quote: Archaeologist Andrew Young described the experiment in which he sat on top of the slabs to provide extra weight.
He said: "The true test was when a colleague used his index finger to move me forward - a mere push and the slabs and I shot forward.
"This proved the balls could move large heavy objects and could be a viable explanation of how giant stones were moved."
The team went on to carry out a life-size test funded by an American TV documentary maker.
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Lets look at one of these precision engineered balls... of which 425 are known.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]780[/ATTACH] OR [ATTACH=CONFIG]781[/ATTACH]
etc... see more here: http://www.ashmolean.org/ash/britarch/hi...balls.html
Not exactly spheres are they? They are amazing, but hardly ball bearings! :0