29th November 2010, 03:52 PM
I refer the honourable Dinosaur to the answer given previously.
This is what I tried to do, often causing a clash of heads, and sometimes overstepping a mark, which teh contractor was right to point out..." it is not in the brief. " OR " This is just an eval, it is up to you to decide whether it should go to a costed mitigation "
When it was all that happened though, I would also weigh up... is it enough, without going to a costly mitigation... if we were to add an extra paragraph... would that give the report some value.
ITs hard... I am sure Vulpes will have an opinion... though it will be short and er...pithy I expect!
Quote:The review is of the quality of the report on the site. The curator still has oversight of and responsibility for the quality of the fieldwork.
This is what I tried to do, often causing a clash of heads, and sometimes overstepping a mark, which teh contractor was right to point out..." it is not in the brief. " OR " This is just an eval, it is up to you to decide whether it should go to a costed mitigation "
When it was all that happened though, I would also weigh up... is it enough, without going to a costly mitigation... if we were to add an extra paragraph... would that give the report some value.
ITs hard... I am sure Vulpes will have an opinion... though it will be short and er...pithy I expect!