30th November 2010, 01:33 AM
Sorry, my mistake. Wasn't intending to grossly misrepresent anyone. It is a nice idea to peer review all publication reports, whoever's it was (Dinosaur's probably), but you did flesh it out and suggest how it could work in this context Odinn, thanks. :face-approve: But I think we'll probably have to stick with the system we have for now, for better or worse. Regional (and national / subject) research agenda haven't been raised much yet in this discussion but greater use of these by all concerned should help.