7th December 2010, 03:48 PM
I personally wouldn't get too bothered about this proposal. It still has the 'local plan' at the core of communal planning advice and, although the article doesn't state a time limit, I am certain that this will be for a fixed period so it won't be a case of 'planning at a whim'. Infact as the current local plan system also involves public consultation, I don't really see much difference in the system.
Where things will go wrong is if 'locals' get the idea that any form of development of their property or land is allowable irrespective of whether the regulation is provided by neighbourhood groups or by local government. There is also an enforcement question. Will local planners still be enforcing the 'neighbourhood group' conscensus or will some form of 'neighbourhood watch' take over? Erm.....have they really thought this out?
Where things will go wrong is if 'locals' get the idea that any form of development of their property or land is allowable irrespective of whether the regulation is provided by neighbourhood groups or by local government. There is also an enforcement question. Will local planners still be enforcing the 'neighbourhood group' conscensus or will some form of 'neighbourhood watch' take over? Erm.....have they really thought this out?
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...