8th December 2010, 07:09 PM
so, I'm cynical? Perhaps. I found Carver's editorial rather cynical in tone, particularly in it's ill-informed dismissal of the historic environment. Just because Tom King finds it hard to commit to nailing the thing down, doesn't mean the rest of us have any real trouble. Particularly when it is identified so widely e.g. PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment, Historic Environment Records and so on. Hardly a new, or particularly challenging concept. No, I don't find the editorial particularly illuminating, glad it tickled you though BAJR and thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll show it to our Heritage Champion. :face-kiss: Not sure how Prof Carver's self-congratulatory and oh so zeitgeisty words contribute to
Quote:the Historic Environment united in moving forward with more than just words. Make ourselves useful???? You mean we aren't useful already.... I didn't realise all this came down to the sector being useless. Cheers BAJR :face-approve: