30th January 2011, 12:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 30th January 2011, 12:12 PM by Stephen Jack.)
BAJR Wrote:Er.... that would be the official AUP which clearly states the requirements to be able to post on BAJR. which is why the last one was removed.
Its unofficial due to the fact that it is not what people sign up to. The rules that we sign up to is not the AUP you refer to.
BAJR Wrote:This is now a reasoned opinion... rather than direct attacks on named individuals and organisations. Now we all know about Selkirk.... so job done.
No that's not correct either as the main criticism against <removed> could not be referred to. Great AUP that allows half a story, not impressed at all . To answer your question from several threads ago yes I do think I can do better job than this substandard archaeology, too many mediocre archaeologists masquerading as experts