4th March 2011, 10:04 PM
so the cbi and the ifa make claims that dont appear to be true so what else is not true...
cba made its self into an organisation for members from being an organisition for organisations (it went in the opposite way than the ifa who went RAO at ruoghly the same time) but the cba want funding from the british academy-no taxation without representation--it then supports voulennters against professionals but is presumably run by professionals who must as far as I am concerned be undermining the professionals (my definition for a professional is somebody who tries to make a living from thier knowledge) as far as I can see nowhere does the cba set out to ensure my living and as far as I can see competes against me for funding for its own projects. The cba dont seem to be very "academic" which is what I think the academy should fund and presumably does through numerous postgraduate grants in archaeology....RIP CBA
cba made its self into an organisation for members from being an organisition for organisations (it went in the opposite way than the ifa who went RAO at ruoghly the same time) but the cba want funding from the british academy-no taxation without representation--it then supports voulennters against professionals but is presumably run by professionals who must as far as I am concerned be undermining the professionals (my definition for a professional is somebody who tries to make a living from thier knowledge) as far as I can see nowhere does the cba set out to ensure my living and as far as I can see competes against me for funding for its own projects. The cba dont seem to be very "academic" which is what I think the academy should fund and presumably does through numerous postgraduate grants in archaeology....RIP CBA
Reason: your past is my past