3rd August 2008, 09:18 PM
Interesting one this, for a few points..
a) A curatorial list of approved contractors.. and the giving out of lists.. this is based on?? I was under the impression that Councils were not able to give approved contractor lists... and would have to provide valid criteria for this.
b) You already have a record that you are capable
c) Surely the best bar is what I used to do anyway... ie... check your reports, and when they come in knock them back if they do not meet the required standards as set in the brief/wsi etc..
I would suspect that a council dc arcaheologist should be careful about lists.
[hm]
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
a) A curatorial list of approved contractors.. and the giving out of lists.. this is based on?? I was under the impression that Councils were not able to give approved contractor lists... and would have to provide valid criteria for this.
b) You already have a record that you are capable
c) Surely the best bar is what I used to do anyway... ie... check your reports, and when they come in knock them back if they do not meet the required standards as set in the brief/wsi etc..
I would suspect that a council dc arcaheologist should be careful about lists.
[hm]
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers