20th July 2011, 11:20 AM
[quote=Unitof1]
Most pre planning application archaeological information is mostly not in the public domain and nor should it be.
I never read other peoples reports unless they are germane and easily available
In as much that I hold the physical examination of the site to be the singular of archaeological significance,
I have no use of what might not be or is in someone?s add hock collection of so called archaeological information. As an aside the information in somebody?s HER is not and cannot be consistent between sites.
That these SMRs should not be funded and will not exit outside the index of a museum collection is the world in which I imagine that we are going to exist in the future.]
Most pre planning application archaeological information is mostly not in the public domain and nor should it be.
I never read other peoples reports unless they are germane and easily available
In as much that I hold the physical examination of the site to be the singular of archaeological significance,
I have no use of what might not be or is in someone?s add hock collection of so called archaeological information. As an aside the information in somebody?s HER is not and cannot be consistent between sites.
That these SMRs should not be funded and will not exit outside the index of a museum collection is the world in which I imagine that we are going to exist in the future.]
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers