27th July 2011, 03:48 PM
And the CLG response to the National Trust campaign statement is to refer to an heritage body that welcomes the proposed changes. Well I never. Perhaps the IfA may wish to ask the CLG to refrain from further claims of support until the Institute has formulated a considered view.
[QUOTE][
Response to incorrect claims by the National Trust that planning reforms will lead to unchecked and damaging development
Published26 July 2011
The Department for Communities and Local Government responds to incorrect claims by the National Trust that reforms of the planning system will lead to unchecked and damaging development.
A spokesperson said:
[INDENT]"This is plain wrong. The draft policy framework fulfils the commitment in the coalition agreement to protect the Green Belt and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. There are similarly strong protections for the historic environment, which have been welcomed by heritage bodies. These protections are crystal clear in the document.
"In fact the policy framework gives communities a brand new opportunity to protect those green spaces outside of the Green Belt that are of particular special value to the community.
"There is a strict test that all new growth must be sustainable. Where it is consistent with environmental objectives - including maintaining the Green Belt - proposals should proceed without delay.
"These reforms allow local people to participate in planning. Having 1000 pages of planning policy made policy less clear and excluded communities."
[/INDENT]/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][
Response to incorrect claims by the National Trust that planning reforms will lead to unchecked and damaging development
Published26 July 2011
The Department for Communities and Local Government responds to incorrect claims by the National Trust that reforms of the planning system will lead to unchecked and damaging development.
A spokesperson said:
[INDENT]"This is plain wrong. The draft policy framework fulfils the commitment in the coalition agreement to protect the Green Belt and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. There are similarly strong protections for the historic environment, which have been welcomed by heritage bodies. These protections are crystal clear in the document.
"In fact the policy framework gives communities a brand new opportunity to protect those green spaces outside of the Green Belt that are of particular special value to the community.
"There is a strict test that all new growth must be sustainable. Where it is consistent with environmental objectives - including maintaining the Green Belt - proposals should proceed without delay.
"These reforms allow local people to participate in planning. Having 1000 pages of planning policy made policy less clear and excluded communities."
[/INDENT]/QUOTE]