22nd August 2011, 08:46 PM
For the benefit of the public as well as monty
On a public forum you have claimed that as a matter of fact there is a consultant (or consultants) that are accepting money( or as you say hefty back-handers) as well as falsifying archaeology ( pretending no archaeology exists)
Now, this means that an air of suspicion falls on all consultants, and that includes me - when I act in that capacity. Because you are not naming names (which is against the AUP), then it means that all consultants are tarnished. plus please give some of us who have or still are been in teh planning system as development control archaeologists... we can see through ploys.
I am asking once again... get in touch privately, - as per normal, this is confidential, but allows me to be confident about allowing accuasations (yes I am afraid you have accused consultants (unnamed and unknown numbers) of accepting back-handers to 'lose' archaeology. The legal ramifications are that I am aware of wtf is going on, and remember, this forum is such that I am the one that is legally responsible for all content. So do me the courtesy of telling me the rumour, grapevine, hearsay or TRUTH (which it may be -?) I simpley don't know. For al I know you could be suggesting that I have taken back handers when I act as a consultant.
You see what I mean?
You can't just say...
That just leaves the the door open to doubting ALL consultants.
please monty... let me know on a completely confidential level --- and the same goes for everyone.
On another note, I am very sad about which way this thread went. :face-topic:
On a public forum you have claimed that as a matter of fact there is a consultant (or consultants) that are accepting money( or as you say hefty back-handers) as well as falsifying archaeology ( pretending no archaeology exists)
Now, this means that an air of suspicion falls on all consultants, and that includes me - when I act in that capacity. Because you are not naming names (which is against the AUP), then it means that all consultants are tarnished. plus please give some of us who have or still are been in teh planning system as development control archaeologists... we can see through ploys.
I am asking once again... get in touch privately, - as per normal, this is confidential, but allows me to be confident about allowing accuasations (yes I am afraid you have accused consultants (unnamed and unknown numbers) of accepting back-handers to 'lose' archaeology. The legal ramifications are that I am aware of wtf is going on, and remember, this forum is such that I am the one that is legally responsible for all content. So do me the courtesy of telling me the rumour, grapevine, hearsay or TRUTH (which it may be -?) I simpley don't know. For al I know you could be suggesting that I have taken back handers when I act as a consultant.
You see what I mean?
You can't just say...
Quote:there are many instances of Consultancies taking backsheesh to pretend there are no archaeological implications and forcing poor standards and bare minima............ County Archaeologists cannot and do not monitor ALL projects............it's a cruel world out there !!! .well known practices but never brought to light and have increased over the last few years with the state of the economy........come on we all know IT DOES HAPPEN !!!!!
That just leaves the the door open to doubting ALL consultants.
please monty... let me know on a completely confidential level --- and the same goes for everyone.
On another note, I am very sad about which way this thread went. :face-topic: