20th September 2011, 04:07 PM
Its not any good is it?
ify seem to have invented something called a self-employed "worker" who seems to be employed by an employer to cut costs. This isnt a policy on self employment its a policy on employers employing.
And when they dare call anybody a self employed archaeologist they have to take it back straight away
They dont understand what an archaeologist is do they. And this is why they have to stuff their membership with specialists post ex scroungers who in this case suddenly become ?sub-contractors?.
ify seem to have invented something called a self-employed "worker" who seems to be employed by an employer to cut costs. This isnt a policy on self employment its a policy on employers employing.
Quote:[SIZE=3]An example of where self-employment might be considered by IfA to conflict with ethical practice would be when self-employed workers are used as a way of cutting costs by avoiding the employers? obligation to provide benefits such as paid leave, sick pay, provision of personal protective equipment etc.
[/SIZE]
And when they dare call anybody a self employed archaeologist they have to take it back straight away
Quote:[SIZE=3]In contrast, there are circumstances where it will be entirely appropriate to engage self-employed archaeologists. An obvious example would be a self-employed finds specialist sub-contracted to a principal contractor as part of a wider project.
[/SIZE]
They dont understand what an archaeologist is do they. And this is why they have to stuff their membership with specialists post ex scroungers who in this case suddenly become ?sub-contractors?.
Reason: your past is my past