26th September 2011, 04:49 PM
What is the situation where an archaeologist wins a contract and then engages SE archaeologists to do the work. Is that not (by the HMRC definition of SE) actually sub-letting the contract? I know that many (but probably not all) archaeological tender exercises specifically forbid the successful tenderer from sub-letting the contract (otherwise we could be in the crazy situation where the contract is re-tendered into ever decreasing smaller parts)...Surely this is something that the IFA should take a policy decision on...
Uo1.... Of course I am an archaeologist!!. Maybe not a very successful or high profile one, but l am happy to work contracts and more than happy with the post I am currently employed at and the 'paltry' salary I receive....but I am more than happy to champion the cause of those archaeologists who are less well off and less than happy with their employment lot.
Uo1.... Of course I am an archaeologist!!. Maybe not a very successful or high profile one, but l am happy to work contracts and more than happy with the post I am currently employed at and the 'paltry' salary I receive....but I am more than happy to champion the cause of those archaeologists who are less well off and less than happy with their employment lot.
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...