26th October 2011, 11:43 AM
I would guess the arguement is that with ROs they would have some comeback if they breach a requirement.
That said, the biggest comeback is not being able to work again as you made such a pigs ear.
I would question the ability of a council to decide only to allow ROs to practice in that County, as that would be seen as a restriction of work to legitimate and hard working people who are not ROs . IT should be up to the client as the council can't really provide an approved list without a rigerous and transparent system for vetting and choosing - being an RO is not in itself good enough - as it can't be shown that non-ROs are not of a high standard as well.
Send me a council that does and I will ask them to respond publicly as to why and how this works. They would have to, given they are a public body.
:face-huh:
That said, the biggest comeback is not being able to work again as you made such a pigs ear.
I would question the ability of a council to decide only to allow ROs to practice in that County, as that would be seen as a restriction of work to legitimate and hard working people who are not ROs . IT should be up to the client as the council can't really provide an approved list without a rigerous and transparent system for vetting and choosing - being an RO is not in itself good enough - as it can't be shown that non-ROs are not of a high standard as well.
Send me a council that does and I will ask them to respond publicly as to why and how this works. They would have to, given they are a public body.
:face-huh: