26th October 2011, 02:37 PM
Seeing all these posts suggest the following.
a) The old and oft used rule - Have they successfully completed work to a standard. - Does not cut it any more?
b) There is a requirement for a higher power than the Curator?
c) An RO - is only as good as the people in it. and only as good as the management of the people. WE can all recite cases wher an RO has done terrible work and a non RO has done great work (and visa versa) so what does this say about the current system?
d) Are curators saying that the current system does not work and there are too many cases of non-ROs doing questionable work that they are powerless to stop. and worse... they can do it over and over again - as the curator can't stop the company continuing to work no matter how many bad jobs they do?
rEgulation? or monopoly?
ps.. in answer to the tongue in cheek remark about BAJR's Contractor list - yes I do }
a) The old and oft used rule - Have they successfully completed work to a standard. - Does not cut it any more?
b) There is a requirement for a higher power than the Curator?
c) An RO - is only as good as the people in it. and only as good as the management of the people. WE can all recite cases wher an RO has done terrible work and a non RO has done great work (and visa versa) so what does this say about the current system?
d) Are curators saying that the current system does not work and there are too many cases of non-ROs doing questionable work that they are powerless to stop. and worse... they can do it over and over again - as the curator can't stop the company continuing to work no matter how many bad jobs they do?
rEgulation? or monopoly?
ps.. in answer to the tongue in cheek remark about BAJR's Contractor list - yes I do }