29th November 2011, 10:06 PM
BAJR Wrote:I have no issue with RO status being seen as a kitemark and something a client can take into consideration when choosing who to carry out their work. I have no issue with a method for policing and utilisation of IfA Standards I also think ther should be a way to ensure quality. WHat I did mind was what was essentially an attempt to snuff out those who are not ROs - NOT on quality but on membership THats the bottom line for me.
Can you do the job? If the answer is yes, then don't be barred.:face-huh:
Well said BAJR and come on you curators out there who were willing to go along with restrictions to ROs only, stand up and justify it to the rest of us If you really belive it is the only way forward then what have you to fear. I am open to a good reasoned argument but I above all I want to see fair play.