10th December 2011, 08:18 AM
I again agree with Kevin.
The thing with a report, draft or not... is that if it is so full of spelling mistakes, grammar - but apart from that, I would send it back, say, fix the spelling and grammar and then send it back in again. apart from that I will pass it. Now, the next time I got a report from this contractor and it was again full of grammar and spelling, I would send it back without comment other than, I am not here as a spellchecker.
Every time it is sent back costs time and money for the contractor. so should ensure developer becomes either happy for a well done report, or unhappy for a poor report.
Explicit banning based on membership of IfA becomes a different issue.
The thing with a report, draft or not... is that if it is so full of spelling mistakes, grammar - but apart from that, I would send it back, say, fix the spelling and grammar and then send it back in again. apart from that I will pass it. Now, the next time I got a report from this contractor and it was again full of grammar and spelling, I would send it back without comment other than, I am not here as a spellchecker.
Every time it is sent back costs time and money for the contractor. so should ensure developer becomes either happy for a well done report, or unhappy for a poor report.
Explicit banning based on membership of IfA becomes a different issue.