24th February 2012, 02:39 PM
kevin wooldridge Wrote:I don't have any problem with that Gwyl and I am sure you are perfectly competent to do what you do. The problem I (and several other people) have with this proposal is that YOU might be excluded from doing work for which you are qualified and competent on the basis of whether or not you or your employer pays a subscription fee. Not from any fair test of competence or qualification.
Well put. And until IFA can demonstrate that all ROs are 'better' than all non-ROs, which is currently not even remotely the case, they should really shut up and wind their necks in about RO-status = competence
- we all know of ROs out there who produce s**t work, I've certainly seen plenty