17th January 2012, 09:40 PM
The abuse he recieved went far beyond what was called for, after all he has done nothing wrong in the eyes of the law of the land. The find was removed from the ground and an excavation/evaluation was undertaken which found nothing, absolutely nothing therefore we will never know its `context` in the landscape.
So I take it you are an archaeologist who works everyday on site removing finds from their contexts therefore whats the difference? I can think of a huge number of large projects in the NW whos finds will never see the light of day or be seen by the public.
Have a look at Sotherbys
So I take it you are an archaeologist who works everyday on site removing finds from their contexts therefore whats the difference? I can think of a huge number of large projects in the NW whos finds will never see the light of day or be seen by the public.
Have a look at Sotherbys