19th January 2012, 10:43 PM
BAJR Wrote:While the scheme has been more widely adopted by organisations providing archaeological services to commercial clients, its relevance has increased as a benchmark of quality for advisory services considering alternative delivery models.
Can anyone shed more light on what exactly this is supposed to either mean or refer to, especially the 'alternative delivery models'. If these models do not involve commercial clients, does this imply that the RO scheme should be rolled out to include Universities, individual community archaeologists, local societies who carry out non-invasive and invasive work? Is this an attempt to introduce a blanket registration scheme, irrespective of contractual responsibilities to a commercial client?