27th January 2012, 01:56 PM
kevin wooldridge Wrote:...................<snip>. phenomenology and landscape archaeology accepted as legitimate approaches to the subject, ......................!
Tut, tut. I'd query that phenomenology has been 'accepted as legitimate' by anyone except the loons:face-stir:
Why is it that archaeologists feel its important to include anything other than reasoned arguments utilising an accurate assessment of the evidence..........(i.e. scientific reasoning).
If you stray from this path you'll end up with flawed and unsubstantiated conclusions which do little except set current knowledge back a few decades.
Evidence is the key. Anything else is just superstition and magic.