1st February 2012, 12:19 PM
BAJR Wrote:To help... watch this --- to Kevin... I don't think the argument is whether there are archaeologists who go to far. It is whether we waste time with pseudos who don't even try to have evidence (or it is so dubious as to be worthless) etc.
Thanks...I totally agree...
@Oxbeast. There are still Norwegian archaeologists s who will take issue with the fact that Helge Ingstad was not an archaeologist by training....much in the same way that Tor Heyerdahl is dismissed as an 'explorer' and not an archaeologist....
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...