18th August 2008, 02:37 PM
"This contract is about the field archaeologist accepting the prior and ongoing consultants arrangements with the curators." Yes, absolutely.
The rest of your post unfortunately demonstrates why people have so much trouble engaging with your arguments. It is overly long, ungrammatical and badly written and veers from point to point. I can see most people losing patience halfway through that huge central paragraph...
I've seen both good and bad consultants, but I think that they're here to stay. Its just the way that the construction industry works. If you need a bridge to be built, get a consultant civil engineer to supervise the contractors. If you have archaeology to be done, get an archaeological consultant to supervise the contractors.
The rest of your post unfortunately demonstrates why people have so much trouble engaging with your arguments. It is overly long, ungrammatical and badly written and veers from point to point. I can see most people losing patience halfway through that huge central paragraph...
I've seen both good and bad consultants, but I think that they're here to stay. Its just the way that the construction industry works. If you need a bridge to be built, get a consultant civil engineer to supervise the contractors. If you have archaeology to be done, get an archaeological consultant to supervise the contractors.