2nd February 2012, 11:54 AM
we still don?tknow what the final draft will be, consultation ends 17th, they then rearrange the word order and do what with it when?
Will the final version only be shown at the wonderful meeting a few minutes before the big democratic vote?
Sorry fellow so called archaeologists, I am not a civil servant so don?t get paid subs and expenses to visit oxford but mainly I don?t agree with any of the code of conduct* which is now a some what diluted and meaningless nothing and will be even more so after ehs egm for yet another standard but also because the codes are pure civil service so no point in being a member.
*not though as bad as the code on contracts which is utter drivel.
Come across a standard for stewardship of the historic environment which I didn?t care existed. Whats that if not a standard for the "advisors" (somehow archaeological" and "practioners")?
Seems to have been created by the Association of County Archaeological Officers or is that algao who don?texist anymore didums
Will the final version only be shown at the wonderful meeting a few minutes before the big democratic vote?
Sorry fellow so called archaeologists, I am not a civil servant so don?t get paid subs and expenses to visit oxford but mainly I don?t agree with any of the code of conduct* which is now a some what diluted and meaningless nothing and will be even more so after ehs egm for yet another standard but also because the codes are pure civil service so no point in being a member.
*not though as bad as the code on contracts which is utter drivel.
Come across a standard for stewardship of the historic environment which I didn?t care existed. Whats that if not a standard for the "advisors" (somehow archaeological" and "practioners")?
Quote:This document
Quote:is for people commissioning, carrying out and regulating work on historic assets and places.
Seems to have been created by the Association of County Archaeological Officers or is that algao who don?texist anymore didums
Reason: your past is my past