12th March 2012, 07:27 PM
Fook me lads, you try and make some constructive comments and you get jumped on. Remind me not to bother next time!
No, i've never worked for less than my bloody contracted overtime rate, as that would be exploitative and really fecking stupid, and would provoke a massive feck off from me. Simples. In fact my last job the overtime offered was well and above my contracted rate.
The point i was trying to make through a rum fuelled haze is that often staff are hired for specific projects, with contracts written specifically for that job, so unit terms and conditions may not be a constant. This happened for units i worked at as a digger back in the distant and rum hazed past ( i likes rum). It therefore may be difficult to keep a database relevant and up to date, so maybe the info should be tied in specific jobs in adverts. This obviously is less use to jobs that may not be advertised and staffed tgrough word of mouth. Also, as it was only 9? Units that replied to the survey how would a useful database be compiled.
I was interested as i've a background in computing and have developed databases for firms both inside and outside of archaeology and often see people run off a cliff designing stuff like this without setting out the basics, and wanted to prompt to see if these were being considered.
No, i've never worked for less than my bloody contracted overtime rate, as that would be exploitative and really fecking stupid, and would provoke a massive feck off from me. Simples. In fact my last job the overtime offered was well and above my contracted rate.
The point i was trying to make through a rum fuelled haze is that often staff are hired for specific projects, with contracts written specifically for that job, so unit terms and conditions may not be a constant. This happened for units i worked at as a digger back in the distant and rum hazed past ( i likes rum). It therefore may be difficult to keep a database relevant and up to date, so maybe the info should be tied in specific jobs in adverts. This obviously is less use to jobs that may not be advertised and staffed tgrough word of mouth. Also, as it was only 9? Units that replied to the survey how would a useful database be compiled.
I was interested as i've a background in computing and have developed databases for firms both inside and outside of archaeology and often see people run off a cliff designing stuff like this without setting out the basics, and wanted to prompt to see if these were being considered.