22nd March 2012, 10:57 AM
havent a clude whats going on with badgers message editor start again
bit disappointed because I thought that the confernce that I would never go to was in march but turns out its not
http://www.archaeologists.net/news/12031...nce-update
and it full of rubbish like
As understand pps5 we dont need so called local authority "" advisor. I would suggest that the partnership should say local authority planning commitee/case officer. I would also suggest that the local museum should also be included as they will be able to point out that 99% of what has been produced by the "advisors" is worthless rubbish.
Been trying to work out why the ifa is allowing itself to get bothered by english heritage over these people in the local authorities/civil servive ponzi schemes
looked at this
http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/defa...srates.pdf
now being selfemployed, this obviously is not a subscription system which understands me- particularly as a follower of the Bernard Mathews ideology of how the tax system is supposed to work and dedicate my efforts in this area
In as much that the subscriptions are a sliding scale, what I dont understand is if a person pays more for membership surely they should get more rights than those who dont. Just wondering what the net worth of local authority "" advisors is compared to non members like me?
[SIZE=1]**corporate members can move to the ?Retired? category by confirming their employment status with the HMRC is declared as retired and their tax code has been altered accordingly
Why would anybody bother to pay to be a retaired member, how many are there, who are they
PS have tried to work out the math behind the variuos scales but remain defeated.[/SIZE]
bit disappointed because I thought that the confernce that I would never go to was in march but turns out its not
http://www.archaeologists.net/news/12031...nce-update
and it full of rubbish like
Quote:The conference theme centres on partnership. The partnership between the local
authority archaeological adviser, the developer and the commercial archaeologist
- and indeed our profession - relies on adequate provision within local
authorities.
As understand pps5 we dont need so called local authority "" advisor. I would suggest that the partnership should say local authority planning commitee/case officer. I would also suggest that the local museum should also be included as they will be able to point out that 99% of what has been produced by the "advisors" is worthless rubbish.
Been trying to work out why the ifa is allowing itself to get bothered by english heritage over these people in the local authorities/civil servive ponzi schemes
looked at this
http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/defa...srates.pdf
now being selfemployed, this obviously is not a subscription system which understands me- particularly as a follower of the Bernard Mathews ideology of how the tax system is supposed to work and dedicate my efforts in this area
Quote:[SIZE=3]*members earning less than ?10,000 (subs category 4) can claim a concessionary rate by sending proof of earnings to the IfA office along with this remittance slip.. Does anybody know what the concessionary rate is.[/SIZE]
In as much that the subscriptions are a sliding scale, what I dont understand is if a person pays more for membership surely they should get more rights than those who dont. Just wondering what the net worth of local authority "" advisors is compared to non members like me?
[SIZE=1]**corporate members can move to the ?Retired? category by confirming their employment status with the HMRC is declared as retired and their tax code has been altered accordingly
Why would anybody bother to pay to be a retaired member, how many are there, who are they
PS have tried to work out the math behind the variuos scales but remain defeated.[/SIZE]
Reason: your past is my past