31st May 2012, 01:26 AM
The issue I would suppose is whether you would consider how you would go about determining a brother
Some could say that a life exchanged for something has a value, whilst others would say what impact can one have within a world of many.
On these terms a multimedia world is the only way to propagate that concept, but this works upon the basis of a continuum of constancy, but that constant is beyond the control of interest, or guile of a selected few.
So really the notion of an event, or manifest point only really works upon the basis of wider analysis and co-ordination, but then that is not so much a few, but a many.
And to ensure a balanced examination of intent, accountability and outcome is really something that works beyond events and incident occurrences.
On these grounds then you would wonder how to work and live within a system which enables the opportunity and fruition of potential to be a real outcome.
I would presume to suggest that it requires continued activism which works within any system, where expectations remain realistic, but also continuous in the determination of realisable goals.
When it comes to those expectations becoming realisable then it stems from the need to depend upon those who make up the actionable and interested process.
It would be these that define that 'brother' whilst gender is really irrelevant outside of the nature of when it was written and of whom it refers.
Henry V,
Nell is also Mistress Quick, who partners with Pistol and knows well of Falstaff.
You would imagine Elizabeth, calling out guards, guards.
Quickly and irreversibly, an absolute outcome could be the issuance of treachery to that absolute power, which we could probably safely affiliate with Saddam Hussein, who held such power, and probably placed such demand of agreeable responses, that the reality of that process would be most effective in the operation and application of inaccuracies and inflated governance.
In such a paradigm, you would hope that whether the power resides within the scenario of Hawkes’ technological ladder in either polarised states would be balanced rather than in the application of absolute influential outcome determinations.
For those whom do not know Hawkes' Ladder stems from ideology to technology in a critical assessment of structured societal indicators, where critical mass within the skill base or a valuative and potentially dominant 'ideology' holds the principle influences.
But in an integrated global networked environment these polarities become insufficient to meet the logistical economics of decision making, and how to move forward aside from political posturing within a pair, or multiple, fighting scorpion scenario.
As such capacitance and logistics determine the potential to work through, and from here the real issue is whether the multimedia medium is utilised to amplify critical junctures throughout decision trees.
The absence of effective communication becomes critical to the degree of self awareness, whilst the nature of the awareness can amplify into coalesced capacitance functions, as externally assessed manifestations.
How can you qualitatively value multi scalar complex numbers or human beings in permanence?
One would hope through the application of stable factors, but those coalesced factors serve only function purposes, and whence, undertaken become the grotesque manifestation of the how to assess 'the barometer of brother'
But Agincourt actually operated as a ideological governance models where the French were manifest as heredities, whilst the English worked upon the hundreds freemen of the counties, or climbing influence barons.
One would hope that the cafe culture finances, are beyond the interests of singular cafe business models, whereupon the utility of supplying a given sector of privilege and prestige, that merrily has Falstaff surly to follow.
'I know thee not' (False staffing), surely absolutely not.
Anyways
Now for something entirely different in/on :face-topic:
Some could say that a life exchanged for something has a value, whilst others would say what impact can one have within a world of many.
On these terms a multimedia world is the only way to propagate that concept, but this works upon the basis of a continuum of constancy, but that constant is beyond the control of interest, or guile of a selected few.
So really the notion of an event, or manifest point only really works upon the basis of wider analysis and co-ordination, but then that is not so much a few, but a many.
And to ensure a balanced examination of intent, accountability and outcome is really something that works beyond events and incident occurrences.
On these grounds then you would wonder how to work and live within a system which enables the opportunity and fruition of potential to be a real outcome.
I would presume to suggest that it requires continued activism which works within any system, where expectations remain realistic, but also continuous in the determination of realisable goals.
When it comes to those expectations becoming realisable then it stems from the need to depend upon those who make up the actionable and interested process.
It would be these that define that 'brother' whilst gender is really irrelevant outside of the nature of when it was written and of whom it refers.
Henry V,
Nell is also Mistress Quick, who partners with Pistol and knows well of Falstaff.
You would imagine Elizabeth, calling out guards, guards.
Quickly and irreversibly, an absolute outcome could be the issuance of treachery to that absolute power, which we could probably safely affiliate with Saddam Hussein, who held such power, and probably placed such demand of agreeable responses, that the reality of that process would be most effective in the operation and application of inaccuracies and inflated governance.
In such a paradigm, you would hope that whether the power resides within the scenario of Hawkes’ technological ladder in either polarised states would be balanced rather than in the application of absolute influential outcome determinations.
For those whom do not know Hawkes' Ladder stems from ideology to technology in a critical assessment of structured societal indicators, where critical mass within the skill base or a valuative and potentially dominant 'ideology' holds the principle influences.
But in an integrated global networked environment these polarities become insufficient to meet the logistical economics of decision making, and how to move forward aside from political posturing within a pair, or multiple, fighting scorpion scenario.
As such capacitance and logistics determine the potential to work through, and from here the real issue is whether the multimedia medium is utilised to amplify critical junctures throughout decision trees.
The absence of effective communication becomes critical to the degree of self awareness, whilst the nature of the awareness can amplify into coalesced capacitance functions, as externally assessed manifestations.
How can you qualitatively value multi scalar complex numbers or human beings in permanence?
One would hope through the application of stable factors, but those coalesced factors serve only function purposes, and whence, undertaken become the grotesque manifestation of the how to assess 'the barometer of brother'
But Agincourt actually operated as a ideological governance models where the French were manifest as heredities, whilst the English worked upon the hundreds freemen of the counties, or climbing influence barons.
One would hope that the cafe culture finances, are beyond the interests of singular cafe business models, whereupon the utility of supplying a given sector of privilege and prestige, that merrily has Falstaff surly to follow.
'I know thee not' (False staffing), surely absolutely not.
Anyways
Now for something entirely different in/on :face-topic: