So the one aurock pit amoungst other pit cuts which did not supply obvious material was only stratified under modern topsoil and you have got residual flint laying about and that the major way that you have found to seperate these features is through radiocarbon dating- what deal you getting for one of those. Did you evaluate the lake sequence? Am I right in thinking that the economics of this excavation rely on the area having to be topsoil stripped and that you are using these features to justify that it be done under archaeological control?
Nascent could be term applied to all these wonderous fabric typologies which for years pot specialists have failed to produce or show any great nessecity for except now that they dont have any work would like a developer tax to fund what ever it is that they dont produce and particularly not in the place where it would belong which is a museum.
"No-one's using it yet" try typing "Rehydroxylation (RHX) dating funding" into google and then compare to "pot fabric typology funding", mess around with a few filters. All we are missing at the moment is a price per sherd.
Nascent could be term applied to all these wonderous fabric typologies which for years pot specialists have failed to produce or show any great nessecity for except now that they dont have any work would like a developer tax to fund what ever it is that they dont produce and particularly not in the place where it would belong which is a museum.
"No-one's using it yet" try typing "Rehydroxylation (RHX) dating funding" into google and then compare to "pot fabric typology funding", mess around with a few filters. All we are missing at the moment is a price per sherd.
Reason: your past is my past