29th August 2008, 01:26 PM
robustly 'investigated' by the IFA if it seen to be advertising and/or paying below IFA rates?
AFTER they have advertised ... not BEFORE.. and only IF it is brought to their attention.
and of course, non RAOs - feel free to pay as little as you like... the JIS will still let it go out on the same sheet of paper, where RAOs will be robustly investigated... thats not fair on RAOs?
ps.. a shoogly peg.. is
a) A wobbly holder for a coat or similar that mat not support the weight of the item place upon it, thus breaking and dropping said item onto ground.
b) An item of late neolithic clothing used to fasten a form of duffel coat, commonly made of bone
c) A Pirates wooden leg which is cut shorter than the other, to give a more rolling gait to enhance walking about desks while at sea.
You choose...
(but I would add the hint of a)
I think we are getting hung up on the JIS - as far as I am concerned... if the IFA want to push for better pay and conditions, they undermine the position, by allowing their own collection of adverts from magazines and newspapers, and other websites, (so there is a manual element) to feature adverts that they would not allow their own RAOs to place.
ergo... the message seems to say... We will robustly investigate RAOs.. but if you ain't an RAO, feel free to pay whatever you want... as although we collect each advert by hand, we take no responsibility for the content of the IFA jobs information sheet. I would suspect (well I know to be fair) they would only lose a few job adverts every week anyway.
Other points on other points other than the JIS gratefully recieved.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
AFTER they have advertised ... not BEFORE.. and only IF it is brought to their attention.
and of course, non RAOs - feel free to pay as little as you like... the JIS will still let it go out on the same sheet of paper, where RAOs will be robustly investigated... thats not fair on RAOs?
ps.. a shoogly peg.. is
a) A wobbly holder for a coat or similar that mat not support the weight of the item place upon it, thus breaking and dropping said item onto ground.
b) An item of late neolithic clothing used to fasten a form of duffel coat, commonly made of bone
c) A Pirates wooden leg which is cut shorter than the other, to give a more rolling gait to enhance walking about desks while at sea.
You choose...
(but I would add the hint of a)
I think we are getting hung up on the JIS - as far as I am concerned... if the IFA want to push for better pay and conditions, they undermine the position, by allowing their own collection of adverts from magazines and newspapers, and other websites, (so there is a manual element) to feature adverts that they would not allow their own RAOs to place.
ergo... the message seems to say... We will robustly investigate RAOs.. but if you ain't an RAO, feel free to pay whatever you want... as although we collect each advert by hand, we take no responsibility for the content of the IFA jobs information sheet. I would suspect (well I know to be fair) they would only lose a few job adverts every week anyway.
Other points on other points other than the JIS gratefully recieved.
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers