How should British Archaeology be run

[Unitof1]

chazame and by the power of right before your eyes a curator is suddenly an archaeologist. I dont see them doing "the" archaeology and I bet that you dont see this point. and you have nicely ignored the doing it all before granting the permission and it seems to me that

if a developer employs a charlatan archaeologist to provide that authority with information or advice and that authority has to rely on other charlatan archaeologists to call into question that information

you basicaly relying for your argument that the majority of the industry is likely to comprises of charlatan archaeologists-well mate thats the standard then. As for expensive law suits we are not that important. But then lets consider what the planning authority might have to consider

1. Application arrives with no mention of archaeology-send it back no curator needed

2. Application arrives with something pretending to be archaeological consideration.-wait to see if during the consultation period there is any comments pertaining to archaeology. If there are no comments accept the archaeological consideration. If there are comments return comments to archaeologist for responce. hoo what will the charleton archaeologist say........how will they get out of this bind......

no curator needed