13th September 2012, 01:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 13th September 2012, 03:08 PM by John Wells.)
Maybe its something for the future when resolution improves and experiments have ironed out issues.
Resolution is not a problem in photography, even when working with a 320x240 pixel thermal imager on a kite:
(That's me at the centre!)
It is better than the usual 1 pixel equivalent per square metre of geophysical surveys.
An image which inspired me was this aerial one taken with a pencam......Yes! a 352 x 288 pixel pencam:
http://www.armadale.org.uk/cairnpapple050.htm
Resolution is not a problem in photography, even when working with a 320x240 pixel thermal imager on a kite:
(That's me at the centre!)
It is better than the usual 1 pixel equivalent per square metre of geophysical surveys.
An image which inspired me was this aerial one taken with a pencam......Yes! a 352 x 288 pixel pencam:
http://www.armadale.org.uk/cairnpapple050.htm