13th September 2012, 01:54 PM
Bubo Wrote:Why yeeeees, i had thought about that.. I will have a look for some training. AutoCAD has a bad reputation then eh...!
There is nothing wrong with AutoCAD per se. Programme is expensive to buy and expensive to update. My problem with its use in archaeology is partly for those reasons, but also because there are more efficient and effective ways of linking graphics to the archaeological data those graphics represent. I get a bit pissed off with requests for me to supply files in CAD format (not difficult from most GIS programmes) whereas requests for data-linked graphics from CAD persons (i.e georeferenced shp files) meets with moans of displeasure...
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...