14th September 2012, 01:01 PM
John Wells Wrote:Maybe its something for the future when resolution improves and experiments have ironed out issues.
Resolution is not a problem in photography, even when working with a 320x240 pixel thermal imager on a kite:
(That's me at the centre!)
It is better than the usual 1 pixel equivalent per square metre of geophysical surveys.
An image which inspired me was this aerial one taken with a pencam......Yes! a 352 x 288 pixel pencam:
http://www.armadale.org.uk/cairnpapple050.htm
Not sure what I'm seeing in this image (other than you in the middle). Is there a non-thermal image for comparison? Whats the dark bits (other than cold), whats the lighter rectangular bit on the left, some walls?