3rd September 2008, 07:59 PM
Every single one of my "clients" (not who I work fors clients employers employer (at best with an undefined contract)) has been a landowner, since I have stopped working for any other archaeological t(may I refer you to the edition of Austin)t. That they have been a landowner, who is undertaking some development that has had forced on them some archaeological consideration by some undeveloped pensioned zygote is what I have been there to grease with my extremely dear knowledge of the trowel. Not a single one has said, my builder has to employer you according my consultant. Currently the local mounty is accusing me of not archiving 90 sites. The landowners seem happy, whats the problem?