6th October 2012, 12:37 PM
I'd agree there is a range of products to contend with from the FA, MOLAS and research undertakings.
The question I would ask is whether we see the role of field archaeology as sterilisers, facilitators, or formulators?
I would suggest this process is more complicated than anyone would be able to put a finger on.
I would be nice to discuss, but I don't think we would be in a position to extrapolate a debate outside of classical 'standards' debates.
There are discussions regarding horses for courses, but I feel that data utility would be a simple step to take, but an eternity in understanding thoroughly throughout is another matter.
I don't want to go about redefining a debate, but I think clarity would be of considerable assistance.
However, promotions are a matter of personal career development, whilst non-interactive recording leaves career development of recording in the rut of how work is undertaken feasibly.
At this point we return to tender pricing and cutting (data integrity?) corners.
In my understanding there is alot of justification targeted at costs, whilst data integrity justification archiving may be a residual concept.
But I don't know and have no basis for stipulating this as a real concern.
Anyway
The question I would ask is whether we see the role of field archaeology as sterilisers, facilitators, or formulators?
I would suggest this process is more complicated than anyone would be able to put a finger on.
I would be nice to discuss, but I don't think we would be in a position to extrapolate a debate outside of classical 'standards' debates.
There are discussions regarding horses for courses, but I feel that data utility would be a simple step to take, but an eternity in understanding thoroughly throughout is another matter.
I don't want to go about redefining a debate, but I think clarity would be of considerable assistance.
However, promotions are a matter of personal career development, whilst non-interactive recording leaves career development of recording in the rut of how work is undertaken feasibly.
At this point we return to tender pricing and cutting (data integrity?) corners.
In my understanding there is alot of justification targeted at costs, whilst data integrity justification archiving may be a residual concept.
But I don't know and have no basis for stipulating this as a real concern.
Anyway