12th November 2012, 01:35 PM
kevin wooldridge Wrote:I think the problem might be (as David and Dino have alluded to in previous posts), that one person could be perfectly happy with a rate of pay and terms and conditions, that would seriously piss off someone else!! Pay is not the only yardstick by which people measure happiness and contentment. A campaign of naming and shaming based solely on rate of pay, would I think be counter-productive.....well if you want a comments box or tick boxes for levels of job satisfaction then all to the good but given that most people would like to have a career and the prospect of such a career including reasonable terms and conditions and the ability to support a family etc i think pay is a pretty essential place to start. archaeology need not be the preserve of management apologists, batchelor nerds and the socially challanged
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers